<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CORRECTIONS MERC &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://correctionsmerc.com/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=1" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://correctionsmerc.com</link>
	<description>Corrections MERC Info Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Update&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://correctionsmerc.com/?p=1057</link>
		<comments>http://correctionsmerc.com/?p=1057#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://correctionsmerc.com/?p=1057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greetings Division     ASMPP     The parties met with Vice-Chair Keller into the evening hours of August 25th, 2010.   Parties presented their respective position on managements ASMPP program.   As the matter progresses, the results will be &#8230; <a href="http://correctionsmerc.com/?p=1057">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><strong>Greetings Division</strong></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong>ASMPP</strong></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The parties met with Vice-Chair Keller into the evening hours of August 25th, 2010.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Parties presented their respective position on managements ASMPP program.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>As the matter progresses, the results will be communicated to the division.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>We are expecting that these matters to have a more detailed report by the fall.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong>Roll Overs</strong></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>In MCSCS we continue to move on more roll over&#8217;s for our fixed term members, at this point however it is on a site by site bases.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>We are optimistic that some day that all workers in MCSCS will be regular full time, like other law enforcement agencies, and there will be little or no need for folks to be unclassified. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>In Solidarity, MERC</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>                                               </div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://correctionsmerc.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1057</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meeting Around Liberal O&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://correctionsmerc.com/?p=1052</link>
		<comments>http://correctionsmerc.com/?p=1052#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 03:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://correctionsmerc.com/?p=1052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greetings Division     I along with many others attended an emergency meeting called by OPSEU on Tuesday August 10th, the meeting was regarding the Government&#8217;s Compensation Restraint Policy. In attendance were all Board members, OPS MERC/CERC Chairs, BPS Sector &#8230; <a href="http://correctionsmerc.com/?p=1052">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><strong>Greetings Division</strong></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>I along with many others attended an emergency meeting called by OPSEU on Tuesday August 10th, the meeting was regarding the Government&#8217;s Compensation Restraint Policy. In attendance were all Board members, OPS MERC/CERC Chairs, BPS Sector Chairs and the Chairs of CAAT(A) and CAAT(S)&#8230;.as well as staff </p>
<p>Brother Smokey Thomas&#8217;s report on the Meetings:</p></div>
<div>
There was an initial meeting with the Minister of Finance on July 20, which was described as unproductive.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The Dalton McGuinty Liberals want 0+0 for the first 2 years of contracts that are currently being negotiated, furthermore, any contracts that will be expiring in the future (like the OPS&#8217;s), to have 0+0 for the first 2 years of the next contract, so for the OPS this would be 2013 and 2014 and this would be enforced regardless of which party was in power.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>On August 9, 2010, Smokey and a small contingent of leaders and staff of OPSEU again met with the Ministers and senior management.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Smokey said that there is some common ground and that he wanted to proceed with basic Union principles, like free Collective Bargaining and Union Rights.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> Throughout the day it was stressed that this is consultation, not negotiation. The President has stressed that he wanted to proceed intelligently and methodically.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The Era of Restraint&#8221; Staff Presentation</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Staff gave a history of wages and the message was that &#8220;wages are going to profits&#8221;. A wage freeze is not a wage freeze as we would be losing due to inflation. As corporations make more money, that money is going to profits, not to workers&#8217; salary.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>It was noted that the corporate tax breaks that have been announced amount to approximately $2.5 billion. The government wants the public sector union to give up $2.5 billion to finance these corporate tax breaks. Along with anything else they can squeeze from other unions and workers.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The presentation went on to review the Liberal strategy to sell the wage freeze to the public and private sector.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Some of the comments; </div>
<div> </div>
<div>There doesn&#8217;t seem to be a clear person in government that has the authority to agree to anything that is being consulted on.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The government has walked away from &#8220;agreements&#8221; in the past, CTO is a very good example of one, and there are others that we have spent a lot of time and money negotiating in good faith, only to be slapped down afterwards.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Is it better to be the first or last to get a deal?</div>
<div> </div>
<div> Some suggested being the first. Interesting discussion occurred afterwards, in particular regarding the other Unions who are being spoken to on the Liberals in their time table of a second and third phase of discussions.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> The government time table has them wanting to speak with OPSEU, CAW, SEIU, University Faculty Association, CAW has walked away from table on first day. Phase two the government plans on speaking with ONA (Nurses), OMA (Ont Medical Association) CUPE, COPE, CLAC (Christian Labour), USW (steel), Labourers Unions, Food and Commercial Workers. The Third Phase are Teachers, ATU (Transit Workers), Power Workers, CEP</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The leaders in attendance recommended that the board consider passing a motion that an all presidents meeting be called to consult with them and seek their thoughts on how the union should proceed with the government. There was a further recommendation that the union not continue talks with the government until the presidents meeting could be organized and the presidents could be consulted. The OPSEU Executive Board Voted for both items as well as adding that groups from the August 10th meeting be in attendance, staff are trying to arrange for space to hold such meetings.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I have attached the power point presentation as well as an article that was posted on MSN News.</div>
<div>
In Sol., Eddy</div>
<div>POWER POINT PRESENTATION: <a href="http://correctionsmerc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Aug10presentation.Aug0910.ppt">Click Here!!</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div><cite><span style="color: #666666;">By </span><a title="http://money.ca.msn.com/investing/michael-brush/articleindex.aspx" href="mhtml:{C3E34379-65BE-4A2E-B55A-E615F06C6466}mid://00000041/!x-usc:http://money.ca.msn.com/investing/michael-brush/articleindex.aspx"><span style="color: #07519a;">Michael Brush, </span></a></cite><span style="color: #666666;">August 11, 2010</span></div>
<div>
<div id="ahead">
<h1>Eight CEOs&#8217; total windfall: $250 million</h1>
<p>As stock prices tumbled in 2008-09, companies made huge options grants to their top execs, who then scored millions when the market recovered. See who&#8217;s up $75 million.</p>
</div>
<div id="abody">
<p>It&#8217;s no surprise anymore that CEOs get lavish bonuses &#8212; even when shareholders lose money or when CEO pay is supposedly declining at least a little.</p>
<p>But when I wrote a couple of months ago about the latest way chief executives are collecting bonanzas &#8212; in &#8220;<a title="http://money.ca.msn.com/investing/michael-brush/article.aspx?cp-documentid=24471291" href="mhtml:{C3E34379-65BE-4A2E-B55A-E615F06C6466}mid://00000041/!x-usc:http://money.ca.msn.com/investing/michael-brush/article.aspx?cp-documentid=24471291"><span style="color: #07519a;">Five huge CEO paydays</span></a>&#8221; &#8212; it wasn&#8217;t clear just how well some of them had made out during the Great Recession we&#8217;ve just been through.</p>
<p>Turns out, based on the latest numbers compiled by the pay experts at <a title="http://www.thecorporatelibrary.com/" onclick="return Msn.Navigation.OpenNew(event,this)" href="mhtml:{C3E34379-65BE-4A2E-B55A-E615F06C6466}mid://00000041/!x-usc:http://www.thecorporatelibrary.com/"><span style="color: #07519a;">The Corporate Library</span></a>, a corporate governance research company, just eight lucky CEOs in a stock-option-based Great Recession lottery had shared a quarter-billion-dollar profit as of Aug. 4. That was an average of $31.6 million each, in addition to their regular pay and perks.</p>
<p>The biggest winner? Sirius XM Radio (<a title="http://g.msn.com/ca55/168?Symbol=US%3ASIRI" onmouseover="MSNFinS.cs_hideddrivetip();MSNFinS.cs_ddrivetip('SIRI.O','US:SIRI'); " href="mhtml:{C3E34379-65BE-4A2E-B55A-E615F06C6466}mid://00000041/!x-usc:http://g.msn.com/ca55/168?Symbol=US%3ASIRI" target="_blank"><span style="color: #07519a;">SIRI.O</span></a>) CEO Mel Karmazin, who was up more than $75 million on a huge grant of 120 million options he got in June 2009 as Sirius stock traded down to just 43 cents. The stock recently went for $1.06.</p>
<p>He was followed by Ford Motor (<a title="http://g.msn.com/ca55/168?Symbol=US%3AF" onmouseover="MSNFinS.cs_hideddrivetip();MSNFinS.cs_ddrivetip('F.N','US:F'); " href="mhtml:{C3E34379-65BE-4A2E-B55A-E615F06C6466}mid://00000041/!x-usc:http://g.msn.com/ca55/168?Symbol=US%3AF" target="_blank"><span style="color: #07519a;">F.N</span></a>) CEO Alan Mulally and Starbucks (<a title="http://g.msn.com/ca55/168?Symbol=US%3ASBUX" onmouseover="MSNFinS.cs_hideddrivetip();MSNFinS.cs_ddrivetip('SBUX.O','US:SBUX'); " href="mhtml:{C3E34379-65BE-4A2E-B55A-E615F06C6466}mid://00000041/!x-usc:http://g.msn.com/ca55/168?Symbol=US%3ASBUX" target="_blank"><span style="color: #07519a;">SBUX.O</span></a>) CEO Howard Schultz, up $55.7 million and $44.9 million, respectively. Oracle (<a title="http://g.msn.com/ca55/168?Symbol=US%3AORCL" onmouseover="MSNFinS.cs_hideddrivetip();MSNFinS.cs_ddrivetip('ORCL.O','US:ORCL'); " href="mhtml:{C3E34379-65BE-4A2E-B55A-E615F06C6466}mid://00000041/!x-usc:http://g.msn.com/ca55/168?Symbol=US%3AORCL" target="_blank"><span style="color: #07519a;">ORCL.O</span></a>) CEO Larry Ellison took fourth place, up $26.3 million on Great Recession stock grants. (The Corporate Library&#8217;s list of eight appears below.)</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how this CEO pay bonanza works.</p>
<p><strong>Stock down? Have a bunch more</strong><br />
As the credit crunch tanked the markets during 2008 and early 2009, almost 200 companies shifted into overdrive on stock options awards. They handed out grants to top executives at a pace that far exceeded anything we&#8217;ve seen in recent history. Stockholders might have found that an interesting priority, given that all those options tended to dilute earnings and hold down stock prices.</p>
<p>When the market rebounded, most stocks went with it, and these CEOs made out like bandits.</p>
<p>Pay experts suggest companies instead might have considered that they were issuing new options near longtime lows during a crisis and adjusted the number of grants downward.</p>
<p>&#8220;It seems that it is always upside for the CEO, and there is never an adjustment made so that they suffer in the slightest,&#8221; says Greg Ruel, one of the authors of the Corporate Library study, called the 2010 Mega-Grants Survey.</p>
<p>All the execs in the <a title="http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/CompanyFocus/EuropeanCEOsMakeHalfThePay.aspx" onclick="return Msn.Navigation.OpenNew(event,this)" href="mhtml:{C3E34379-65BE-4A2E-B55A-E615F06C6466}mid://00000041/!x-usc:http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/CompanyFocus/EuropeanCEOsMakeHalfThePay.aspx"><span style="color: #07519a;">Corporate Library</span></a> study are based in the U.S., where, by the way, CEOs already made far more than their European counterparts for the same work, even without these options bonanzas.</p>
<p>My earlier column included three CEOs who also made The Corporate Library&#8217;s list of the eight biggest winners, including Ford&#8217;s Mulally at No. 2. Here&#8217;s a look at the three other members who make up the top four.</p>
<p><strong>A Sirius-ly big score</strong><br />
By far, Karmazin, of Sirius XM Radio, came out on top in the list of Great Recession options winners. Thanks to the timing of that 120 million-option grant on June 30, 2009, Karmazin got an extremely favorable exercise price of just 43 cents. (Options give recipients the right to buy stock in the future at prices set when the options are issued.)</p>
<p>Karmazin was up as much as $96 million at the stock&#8217;s recent peak in May, though that&#8217;s slid now to a mere $75.6 million.</p>
<p>Sorry about that, Mel. But in a media world where the rank and file suffered big layoffs in the recession &#8212; and as Sirius has laid off many since its merger with XM Radio &#8212; you&#8217;ve managed to make a bundle.</p>
<p>Karmazin&#8217;s fans might argue he is worth all this money because he&#8217;s orchestrating what looks like a successful turnaround &#8212; the main reason I bought Sirius stock a few months ago. In early August, Sirius XM Radio announced 16% revenue growth and a sharp gain in subscribers. Plus Karmazin is paying down debt, which has been a big concern among investors.</p>
<p>But with the stock down from the $5 range when he took over, investors have suffered hefty losses on Karmazin&#8217;s watch. His giant grant spared him some of that pain, replacing a 2004 grant of 30 million options with an exercise price of $4.72 a share &#8212; basically worthless due to those stock losses.</p>
<p>Worth it or not, Karmazin doesn&#8217;t have to do anything to collect all that loot, thanks to some twists in his option contract.</p>
<p>The Sirius board failed to put any performance metrics into the four-year vesting schedule for his options. In other words, if Sirius stock just follows the market up as the economy recovers, he will get to cash in all those options within four years.</p>
<p>And if he leaves the company and someone else does a great job in his shoes, Karmazin will still reap rewards. That&#8217;s because, unlike most employees, Karmazin keeps all those his options even if he leaves the company during that period, unless he&#8217;s fired for serious misconduct.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div> </div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://correctionsmerc.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1052</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
